Atiku Criticize Tinubu’s State of Emergency in Rivers, Deeming It a Threat to Democracy
Atiku Criticize Tinubu’s State of Emergency in Rivers, Deeming It a Threat to Democracy
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has issued a strong denunciation of President Bola Tinubu’s recent decision to impose a state of emergency in Rivers State, characterizing the move as a clear example of political manipulation and indicative of bad faith. Atiku’s remarks emphasize his belief that Tinubu’s actions are more aligned with partisan interests than the well-being of the state and its people, alleging that the President has played a direct role in exacerbating the crisis that has engulfed Rivers State.
In his critique, Atiku expressed disappointment over Tinubu’s apparent failure or deliberate neglect in addressing the escalating tensions and unrest in the region. He lamented that under Tinubu’s administration, the Niger Delta has descended into a period of violent turmoil, effectively reversing the efforts made during the tenure of late President Umaru Yar’Adua, who is often credited with fostering stability in the area. Atiku’s statements reflect a deeper concern that such political maneuvering is detrimental not only to Rivers State but also undermines national democratic principles.
“If federal infrastructure in Rivers has been compromised, then the responsibility lies squarely with the President,” Atiku asserted. He further condemned the notion of punishing the citizens of Rivers State as a tactic for political gamesmanship, labeling it an assault on the democratic values that are foundational to the nation’s governance. His comments suggest a belief that the ramifications of the state of emergency will extend far beyond the immediate political landscape, potentially stifling democratic discourse and deepening societal divides.
The state of emergency declared by President Tinubu was a response to increasing political tensions and conflict in Rivers State. This decision has resulted in the suspension of not only Governor Siminalayi Fubara but also his deputy and the entire State House of Assembly for a period of six months. In defense of his controversial decision, Tinubu explained that intervention was imperative due to what he referred to as the political paralysis and failures in governance that have plagued the state.
Atiku’s vehement response to the situation in Rivers highlights a growing unease among political figures regarding the implications of such emergency measures on democratic governance and stability within the region. His call for accountability and a return to peaceful dialogue underscores a significant tension as Nigeria grapples with its longstanding issues of political trust and regional governance. As tensions mount, the focus remains on how leaders will navigate these challenges while safeguarding democratic integrity.
