Ogun Chief Judge advises judges to exercise caution in using AI.
Ogun Chief Judge advises judges to exercise caution in using AI.
The Chief Judge of Ogun State, Justice Mosunmola Dipeolu, has called on judges to approach the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with caution, wisdom, and vigilance.
Speaking on Friday during a one-day training session titled “Practical Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary,” held at the Judiciary Complex on Kobape Road, Abeokuta, Justice Dipeolu acknowledged AI’s potential to transform the delivery of justice. However, she also highlighted its limitations.
She emphasized that although AI is a powerful tool that can enhance access to justice and boost judicial efficiency, it lacks the conscience, empathy, and nuanced understanding that are central to judicial responsibilities.
“We are in the midst of a technological revolution that is reshaping all aspects of human activity,” she said. “As the foundation of societal order and the protector of rights, the judiciary cannot afford to be left behind.”
“Our mandate – to deliver timely, efficient, fair, and accessible justice – demands that we harness innovative tools. Artificial Intelligence presents unprecedented opportunities to enhance our capacity to fulfil this sacred duty,” she said.
Dipeolu stressed that the training was organised to equip judicial officers in the state with a foundational and practical understanding of AI, enabling them to integrate it into their daily activities.
She highlighted the growing challenges in the justice sector, including increasing caseloads, higher public expectations for speed and transparency, and the complexity of legal research.
“In today’s world, AI is no longer a futuristic concept—it is a practical tool already making its way into our courtrooms and legal workflows,” Justice Mosunmola Dipeolu stated.
She noted that AI holds the promise of streamlining procedures, enhancing legal research, improving case management, increasing access to justice, and supporting judicial decision-making — but only as a supplement, not a substitute, for human judgment.
Justice Dipeolu said the training was designed to help participants better understand AI by breaking down its concepts, exploring its capabilities and limitations, and examining real-world examples of its application in judicial systems both in Nigeria and abroad.
She further stressed the importance of considering the legal, ethical, and procedural implications of using AI within the justice sector.
“While its potential is significant, we must engage with AI carefully, thoughtfully, and with a strong commitment to our judicial values,” she said. “AI is indeed a powerful tool, but it lacks the conscience, empathy, and deep understanding of justice that define our role as judges.”
She urged her colleagues to approach AI not with fear, but with informed curiosity and an unwavering dedication to their constitutional and judicial responsibilities.
“Let us learn to use this tool wisely, ensuring that it strengthens the pursuit of justice and enriches — rather than erodes — the human element that lies at the heart of adjudication,” she concluded.
